<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><link title="Planet Rocq" href="https://rocq.pl-a.net" rel="alternate"/><link title="Planet Rocq" href="https://rocq.pl-a.net/atom.xml" rel="self"/><icon>https://rocq.pl-a.net/assets/favicon-16x16.png</icon><id>https://rocq.pl-a.net</id><title type="text">Planet Rocq</title><updated>2026-10-07T06:09:16-00:00</updated><entry><source><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/latest.rss</id><title type="text">Rocq Discourse</title></source><link title="Postdoc position at TU Delft" href="https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3111" rel="alternate"/><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3111</id><title type="text">Postdoc position at TU Delft</title><updated>2026-10-06T12:44:00-00:00</updated><author><name>benediktahrens</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/latest.rss</id><title type="text">Rocq Discourse</title></source><link title="NWPT 2026: Deadline Extension Until October 10th" href="https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3129" rel="alternate"/><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3129</id><title type="text">NWPT 2026: Deadline Extension Until October 10th</title><updated>2026-10-06T07:45:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Chad_Mitchell_Nester</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/latest.rss</id><title type="text">Rocq Discourse</title></source><link title="JFLA2027 : Dernier appel à communications" href="https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3128" rel="alternate"/><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3128</id><title type="text">JFLA2027 : Dernier appel à communications</title><updated>2026-10-06T06:17:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Yannick</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/latest.rss</id><title type="text">Rocq Discourse</title></source><link title="Research roles at Melbourne on seL4, agentic security, neural theorem proving" href="https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3127" rel="alternate"/><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3127</id><title type="text">Research roles at Melbourne on seL4, agentic security, neural theorem proving</title><updated>2026-10-05T04:50:00-00:00</updated><author><name>toby.murray</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/latest.rss</id><title type="text">Rocq Discourse</title></source><link title="Rocq 9.3.0" href="https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3126" rel="alternate"/><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3126</id><title type="text">Rocq 9.3.0</title><updated>2026-10-02T12:33:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Y.Ito</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/latest.rss</id><title type="text">Rocq Discourse</title></source><link title="Using vsrocq language server with Emacs" href="https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3119" rel="alternate"/><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3119</id><title type="text">Using vsrocq language server with Emacs</title><updated>2026-09-29T22:13:00-00:00</updated><author><name>TDiazT</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/latest.rss</id><title type="text">Rocq Discourse</title></source><link title="Research positions on Isabelle verification of Agentic seL4" href="https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3122" rel="alternate"/><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3122</id><title type="text">Research positions on Isabelle verification of Agentic seL4</title><updated>2026-09-29T11:22:00-00:00</updated><author><name>andrei</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/latest.rss</id><title type="text">Rocq Discourse</title></source><link title="TYPES 2026: Post-proceedings Call for Papers" href="https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3114" rel="alternate"/><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3114</id><title type="text">TYPES 2026: Post-proceedings Call for Papers</title><updated>2026-09-23T17:40:00-00:00</updated><author><name>sattler</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/latest.rss</id><title type="text">Rocq Discourse</title></source><link title="NWPT 2026, Final Call for Contributions" href="https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3110" rel="alternate"/><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3110</id><title type="text">NWPT 2026, Final Call for Contributions</title><updated>2026-09-15T07:42:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Chad_Mitchell_Nester</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/latest.rss</id><title type="text">Rocq Discourse</title></source><link title="RocqPL 2027 Call for Presentations" href="https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3103" rel="alternate"/><id>https://discourse.rocq-prover.org/t/3103</id><title type="text">RocqPL 2027 Call for Presentations</title><updated>2026-09-09T09:31:00-00:00</updated><author><name>fajb</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Is there a way to make Rocq&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;if-then-else&amp;quot; accept setoid rewriting?" href="https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6642/is-there-a-way-to-make-rocqs-if-then-else-accept-setoid-rewriting" rel="alternate"/><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6642/is-there-a-way-to-make-rocqs-if-then-else-accept-setoid-rewriting</id><title type="text">Is there a way to make Rocq&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;if-then-else&amp;quot; accept setoid rewriting?</title><updated>2026-10-06T16:38:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Sambo</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="In Rocq, can I unfold a single &amp;quot;let _ := _ in _&amp;quot; at a time?" href="https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6536/in-rocq-can-i-unfold-a-single-let-in-at-a-time" rel="alternate"/><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6536/in-rocq-can-i-unfold-a-single-let-in-at-a-time</id><title type="text">In Rocq, can I unfold a single &amp;quot;let _ := _ in _&amp;quot; at a time?</title><updated>2026-09-27T15:04:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Sambo</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Is `rat` harder to use than `Q` for rational numbers in Rocq?" href="https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6638/is-rat-harder-to-use-than-q-for-rational-numbers-in-rocq" rel="alternate"/><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6638/is-rat-harder-to-use-than-q-for-rational-numbers-in-rocq</id><title type="text">Is `rat` harder to use than `Q` for rational numbers in Rocq?</title><updated>2026-09-22T10:43:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Sambo</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Debug autorewrite in Coq" href="https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/2137/debug-autorewrite-in-coq" rel="alternate"/><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/2137/debug-autorewrite-in-coq</id><title type="text">Debug autorewrite in Coq</title><updated>2026-09-11T18:01:00-00:00</updated><author><name>8bc3 457f</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Make [...] explicit in Rocq/vsRocq" href="https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6509/make-explicit-in-rocq-vsrocq" rel="alternate"/><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6509/make-explicit-in-rocq-vsrocq</id><title type="text">Make [...] explicit in Rocq/vsRocq</title><updated>2026-09-02T17:03:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Zlotz</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Non-typed dependent pattern matching in Rocq" href="https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6620/non-typed-dependent-pattern-matching-in-rocq" rel="alternate"/><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6620/non-typed-dependent-pattern-matching-in-rocq</id><title type="text">Non-typed dependent pattern matching in Rocq</title><updated>2026-08-20T09:49:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Bruno</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="An upgrade from Mathcomp v2.4.0 to v2.5.0 going wrong with rationals" href="https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6515/an-upgrade-from-mathcomp-v2-4-0-to-v2-5-0-going-wrong-with-rationals" rel="alternate"/><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/6515/an-upgrade-from-mathcomp-v2-4-0-to-v2-5-0-going-wrong-with-rationals</id><title type="text">An upgrade from Mathcomp v2.4.0 to v2.5.0 going wrong with rationals</title><updated>2026-08-15T10:01:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Zlotz</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Error when making CoqProject" href="https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/4348/error-when-making-coqproject" rel="alternate"/><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/4348/error-when-making-coqproject</id><title type="text">Error when making CoqProject</title><updated>2026-08-03T17:01:00-00:00</updated><author><name>StiftungWarentest</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Is there a model that contradicts `@eq Type t1 t2 -&amp;gt; @eq Prop t1 t2` or can it be proven?" href="https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/5350/is-there-a-model-that-contradicts-eq-type-t1-t2-eq-prop-t1-t2-or-can-it-b" rel="alternate"/><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/5350/is-there-a-model-that-contradicts-eq-type-t1-t2-eq-prop-t1-t2-or-can-it-b</id><title type="text">Is there a model that contradicts `@eq Type t1 t2 -&amp;gt; @eq Prop t1 t2` or can it be proven?</title><updated>2026-08-02T16:05:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Jason Gross</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Induction COQ Question" href="https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/2170/induction-coq-question" rel="alternate"/><id>https://proofassistants.stackexchange.com/questions/2170/induction-coq-question</id><title type="text">Induction COQ Question</title><updated>2026-08-02T12:08:00-00:00</updated><author><name>deleted_user0972</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=coq&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged coq - Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Coq proof - no verifier can be simultaneously sound and complete on a &amp;#181;-sensitive claim from an identical classical trace. Check me please!" href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/57261/coq-proof-no-verifier-can-be-simultaneously-sound-and-complete-on-a-%C2%B5-sensitiv" rel="alternate"/><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/57261/coq-proof-no-verifier-can-be-simultaneously-sound-and-complete-on-a-%C2%B5-sensitiv</id><title type="text">Coq proof - no verifier can be simultaneously sound and complete on a &amp;#181;-sensitive claim from an identical classical trace. Check me please!</title><updated>2026-09-10T14:04:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Neil Thiele</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=coq&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged coq - Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Is injectivity of constructors for (large) inductive types in Prop, such as squashing, consistent?" href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/57098/is-injectivity-of-constructors-for-large-inductive-types-in-prop-such-as-squa" rel="alternate"/><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/57098/is-injectivity-of-constructors-for-large-inductive-types-in-prop-such-as-squa</id><title type="text">Is injectivity of constructors for (large) inductive types in Prop, such as squashing, consistent?</title><updated>2026-04-27T07:31:00-00:00</updated><author><name>paulotorrens</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=coq&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged coq - Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Finite sets in Coq" href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/54619/finite-sets-in-coq" rel="alternate"/><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/54619/finite-sets-in-coq</id><title type="text">Finite sets in Coq</title><updated>2025-01-31T10:05:00-00:00</updated><author><name>anonymous</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=coq&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged coq - Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Representations of Planar Graphs in Coq" href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/44198/representations-of-planar-graphs-in-coq" rel="alternate"/><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/44198/representations-of-planar-graphs-in-coq</id><title type="text">Representations of Planar Graphs in Coq</title><updated>2025-01-08T11:54:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Springberg</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=coq&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged coq - Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Simple Coq simplification question" href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/54378/simple-coq-simplification-question" rel="alternate"/><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/54378/simple-coq-simplification-question</id><title type="text">Simple Coq simplification question</title><updated>2024-06-07T00:03:00-00:00</updated><author><name>whatisit</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=coq&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged coq - Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="What should a proof of correctness for a typechecker actually be proving?" href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/38404/what-should-a-proof-of-correctness-for-a-typechecker-actually-be-proving" rel="alternate"/><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/38404/what-should-a-proof-of-correctness-for-a-typechecker-actually-be-proving</id><title type="text">What should a proof of correctness for a typechecker actually be proving?</title><updated>2024-06-06T19:57:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Vivek Ghaisas</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=coq&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged coq - Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Formalization of matching logic (logic behind K Framework)" href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/53084/formalization-of-matching-logic-logic-behind-k-framework" rel="alternate"/><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/53084/formalization-of-matching-logic-logic-behind-k-framework</id><title type="text">Formalization of matching logic (logic behind K Framework)</title><updated>2023-08-16T20:45:00-00:00</updated><author><name>uhbif19</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=coq&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged coq - Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Notation problem" href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/52907/notation-problem" rel="alternate"/><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/52907/notation-problem</id><title type="text">Notation problem</title><updated>2023-06-01T19:30:00-00:00</updated><author><name>coqbeginner</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=coq&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged coq - Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Can I define nested mutually dependent types in Coq?" href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/52835/can-i-define-nested-mutually-dependent-types-in-coq" rel="alternate"/><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/52835/can-i-define-nested-mutually-dependent-types-in-coq</id><title type="text">Can I define nested mutually dependent types in Coq?</title><updated>2023-05-13T09:24:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Henri_S</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=coq&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged coq - Theoretical Computer Science Stack Exchange</title></source><link title="Defining finite sets inductively in a proof assistant?" href="https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/46767/defining-finite-sets-inductively-in-a-proof-assistant" rel="alternate"/><id>https://cstheory.stackexchange.com/questions/46767/defining-finite-sets-inductively-in-a-proof-assistant</id><title type="text">Defining finite sets inductively in a proof assistant?</title><updated>2023-04-25T19:06:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Siddharth Bhat</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Overflow</title></source><link title="Trouble with well-foundedness proofs" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79979608/trouble-with-well-foundedness-proofs" rel="alternate"/><id>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79979608/trouble-with-well-foundedness-proofs</id><title type="text">Trouble with well-foundedness proofs</title><updated>2026-07-11T04:03:00-00:00</updated><author><name>krab5</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Overflow</title></source><link title="How to get the fully qualified name of a Rocq tactic?" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79962956/how-to-get-the-fully-qualified-name-of-a-rocq-tactic" rel="alternate"/><id>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79962956/how-to-get-the-fully-qualified-name-of-a-rocq-tactic</id><title type="text">How to get the fully qualified name of a Rocq tactic?</title><updated>2026-06-24T16:07:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Costava</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Overflow</title></source><link title="Is it possible to convert all higher-order logic and dependent type in Lean/Isabelle/Coq into first-order logic?" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74508394/is-it-possible-to-convert-all-higher-order-logic-and-dependent-type-in-lean-isab" rel="alternate"/><id>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/74508394/is-it-possible-to-convert-all-higher-order-logic-and-dependent-type-in-lean-isab</id><title type="text">Is it possible to convert all higher-order logic and dependent type in Lean/Isabelle/Coq into first-order logic?</title><updated>2026-05-20T16:47:00-00:00</updated><author><name>ch271828n</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Overflow</title></source><link title="Which vector library to use in coq?" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42302300/which-vector-library-to-use-in-coq" rel="alternate"/><id>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42302300/which-vector-library-to-use-in-coq</id><title type="text">Which vector library to use in coq?</title><updated>2026-03-22T09:52:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Joey Eremondi</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Overflow</title></source><link title="Coq (Rocq) standard library function for converting nat to string?" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79886889/coq-rocq-standard-library-function-for-converting-nat-to-string" rel="alternate"/><id>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79886889/coq-rocq-standard-library-function-for-converting-nat-to-string</id><title type="text">Coq (Rocq) standard library function for converting nat to string?</title><updated>2026-02-11T12:45:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Sambo</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Overflow</title></source><link title="Equality of type with equal indices do not typecheck" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79875397/equality-of-type-with-equal-indices-do-not-typecheck" rel="alternate"/><id>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79875397/equality-of-type-with-equal-indices-do-not-typecheck</id><title type="text">Equality of type with equal indices do not typecheck</title><updated>2026-01-28T17:53:00-00:00</updated><author><name>dvnh87</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Overflow</title></source><link title="How to prove manually (using calc) a Dafny lemma with an existential variable?" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79873921/how-to-prove-manually-using-calc-a-dafny-lemma-with-an-existential-variable" rel="alternate"/><id>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79873921/how-to-prove-manually-using-calc-a-dafny-lemma-with-an-existential-variable</id><title type="text">How to prove manually (using calc) a Dafny lemma with an existential variable?</title><updated>2026-01-25T09:37:00-00:00</updated><author><name>Daniil Iaitskov</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Overflow</title></source><link title="Kind of issue with two-steps recursion" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79864201/kind-of-issue-with-two-steps-recursion" rel="alternate"/><id>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79864201/kind-of-issue-with-two-steps-recursion</id><title type="text">Kind of issue with two-steps recursion</title><updated>2026-01-09T17:25:00-00:00</updated><author><name>David Roman-Ferriere</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Overflow</title></source><link title="How to scrutinize a `match` term with return type `a=b -&amp;gt; c`" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79789111/how-to-scrutinize-a-match-term-with-return-type-a-b-c" rel="alternate"/><id>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79789111/how-to-scrutinize-a-match-term-with-return-type-a-b-c</id><title type="text">How to scrutinize a `match` term with return type `a=b -&amp;gt; c`</title><updated>2025-10-20T15:43:00-00:00</updated><author><name>larsr</name></author></entry><entry><source><id>https://stackoverflow.com/feeds/tags?tagnames=rocq-prover&amp;sort=activity</id><title type="text">Activity questions tagged rocq-prover - Stack Overflow</title></source><link title="How to deal with potentially-aliased arguments in VST?" href="https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79763769/how-to-deal-with-potentially-aliased-arguments-in-vst" rel="alternate"/><id>https://stackoverflow.com/questions/79763769/how-to-deal-with-potentially-aliased-arguments-in-vst</id><title type="text">How to deal with potentially-aliased arguments in VST?</title><updated>2025-09-13T15:23:00-00:00</updated><author><name>tymmym</name></author></entry></feed>